presumably,
in accordance with
Bol Reg. 124, as being required by
Locum tenens, but it is
correctly taken into account for pension &
they are right in giving him the 60
his viz. for Ilyas sevince + 5 yrs + 3 yrs for P. Qualno.
Lee annexed a letter from Mr Browly of the Treasury, to whom I wrote, asking whether, in his opinion, the information furnished in 29384 furnished any strong arguments
whereas the pension already drawn by him in this country is rather at $43 more than the half pay $22.20
As it is, he has drawn 378
I think therefore it would be simpler & fairest to let him off refunding the excess pension already paid
up to 30 June & I would even let him draw the larger pension till the 31st of this month, but tell him that from then he can only draw the smaller pension of $1634, sending him a copy
I am afraid our decision on 12554 will affect this
for we must adhere to that decision
I do not think that we should make Mr Lawson refund the whole excess pension rate of pay which he has drawn, partly in the colony & partly through the C.A., up to the 30th June
On his receiving the settlement, it may be noted that we sanctioned an extension of leave pending his pension & his pension was only now settled, we therefore put him on half pay from 26 Dec, last, when his retirement began, until the present time (his successor does not go out until the end of this month)
BRR him copy 12554, to explain why I was unable to sanction the larger pension. & C.A. inform you. I
I ought to notice one point about this case, viz that under the revised Pension Minute, (herewith), pensions including pensions grantable under O/5 do not actually require the approval of S. of S. but this case was submitted for the S. of S. approval in 12554. Perhaps we ought to ask the C.A. by tel. whether Lawson was warned that the larger pension ($2494) was made subject to S. of S. approval.
as you suggest at A, but all the adjustments regarding the period before he left the colony will involve elaborate adjustments
Proceed in the despatch as at B
C.P.L 24 at once
AC JL(X)-4669-3000-8-01
Page 337
presumably,
accordance with
bol Reg. 124, as being required by
Locum
tenens, but it is
correctly
taken into account for pension &
they
are
right
in
giving
ig him the
60
his
viz. for Ilyas sevince + 5 yrs
+ 3 yrs for P. Qualno.
Lee
annexed
dimate bound
letter from Mr browly
of the Treasury, to whom I wrote, aoking, whether, in his opinion, the
in 29384 furnished any
: desing
arguments
کا
824948
whereas the pension already drawn
him in this country/
by
rather
at 43.
mnore
As
country hat 378 than the half pay $2220
I think therefore it wd. be
simpler & fairet to let him off refunding the excess pension already fard
arry
to 30
of
8 June
& I wd even
let him draw
the larger pension till the 31st of
this
month, but tell him that from the
he can only
draw the smaller
pension of D 1634, sending
Tot Ang he
peerzon
I am afraid but decision,
our decision on 12554.
for
A
of desh on
we must adhere to that
I do not think that
we
And make Ar Lowson refund the whole
1
at
the excess pension rate of any which he has drawn, partly
of
in the colony
& partly through the b.A.. up to the 30th
uet.
In desh on
his receiving
the settlement
may
be
ht
might
le ave
29157/01
we.
sanction we sanctioned
an extension of leave pending
of
regarded
his pension & his pension
ao
only now settled, we therefore put him on
half pay
from 26 Dec, last, when his
retirement began, until the present
time (his su
success or does not go out until
the end of
this month,-
BRR
him copy
the
12554, to explain why
ed. of
I was unable to sanction the larger pension. &
b. A
inform you. I
337
I ought to notice one point
about this case,
virz
that under
the
revised Pension Minute, (herewith), pensions including pensions grantable under 0/5 do not actually require the approval of
but this case
of
was submitted
the S for the I of I approval in 19554. Perhaps
we
f
ought to ask the Day by tel. whether howson was warned that the larger pension (82494) was made subject to che S. of S. approval.
3
A
15193). but this
AC
JL (x)-4669-3000-8-01
as
sued involve elaborate adjustments regards the period before he left the colons
as you suggest
at A, but all the guranos
Proceed
8u7231
in the
despatch as at 3
B
C.P.L
24
atonce
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.